List, John > On Mar 20, 2019, at 3:14 PM, John F Sowa <s...@bestweb.net> wrote: > > On 3/20/2019 11:37 AM, g...@gnusystems.ca <mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca> wrote: >> I thought a Medad was (by definition) a graph with no loose ends. > > NEM 3:164 (or p. 4 of eg1911.pdf) says > "A graph or graph instance having 0 peg is a Medad.”
The conceptualization of medad, monad, dyad,… were introduced as logical terms of a sentence that expressed relations among the terms. Example: John sold a bicycle to Frank for $20.00. This is homologous to the usage of terms in the bedrock of pragmaticism and CSP’s trinity of triads. The meaning of the sentence and the terms of the sentence depends on the organization the terms of the sentence. In my view, these terms , medad, monad, dyad,… , are outside of the logic of set theory, but consistent with chemical usage of terms. CSP never accepted the abstract logic of set theory, instead he choose to enumerate the logical terms as bedrock by counting the number of terms that contributed to the realism of the sentence. As I noted several months ago, in John’s book, he clearly abandon CSP logical schema for the triadic trinity, ignored the concepts of rhema, dicisign and argument, and substituted the set-theoretically based notions of neural - networks. The concepts of medal, monad, dyad,.. were ignored in this analysis of meaning of the triadic trinity. John, what exactly are your views on the relations among "medad, monad, dyad,…” and the mode of extension in set theory? And, what is your perception of the relationships between the bedrock of pragmatism and set theory? Finally, I repeat both my public and private requests for the web address for your recent assertions about the categorization of meaning of set theory w.r.t. CSP notations. Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
