Jerry: It is a trivial question.
You made the following statement: "Logical equivalence has a precise mathematical meaning." I asked: "What is the precise mathematical meaning of "logical equivalence?"" This should not present any undue stress on your ability to answer. It does not appear that a useful 'precise mathematical meaning' of logical equivalence would be a secret. I do not feel compelled to state the simple question again. Do you have the ability to provide a simple answer? Take care, have fun and be good to yourself, Joe On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:52 PM Jerry LR Chandler < jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrote: > List, Joseph: > > Exactly what is an equivalence relation? > Is it possible for any two “instants” to be exactly the same as one > another? > Are we dealing with reality or merely mathematical jargon? > > Joseph Simpson post is very strange… > Is he for or against the concept of “exact equivalence relationships"? > > On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:37 PM, joseph simpson <jjs0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jerry: > > You wrote: > > "Logical equivalence has a precise mathematical meaning. > > No such equivalence relationship is possible, linguistically, either > logically, propositionally, syntactically or semantically." > > What is the precise mathematical meaning of "logical equivalence?" > > Take care, be good to yourself and have fun, > > Joe > > > Thank you for your good wishes. > > You can relax and rest assured that I take excellent care of myself, I am > good to myself and I enjoy life. > > May I ask you to gather up you courage and express what you mean? > > If you lack the courage to participate in a public forum, then please > communicate with me in private. > > Cheers > > Jerry > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:17 PM Jerry LR Chandler < > jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrote: > >> List, John >> >> On Mar 20, 2019, at 8:34 AM, John F Sowa <s...@bestweb.net> wrote: >> >> JAS >> >> We simply prefer different but equally valid (and equally Peircean) >> analyses of a proposition--you throw everything possible into the >> predicate, leaving only an indicated subject; I throw everything >> possible into the subject, leaving only a continuous predicate. >> >> >> I agree that those two methods are logically equivalent. >> >> >> Logically equivalent? >> Logical equivalence has a precise mathematical meaning. >> >> No such equivalence relationship is possible, linguistically, either >> logically, propositionally, syntactically or semantically. >> >> In my view, this barely qualifies as informal jargon. >> >> Cheers >> >> Jerry >> >> > > -- > Joe Simpson > “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people > attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, > depends on unreasonable people.” > George Bernard Shaw > Git Hub link: > https://github.com/jjs0sbw > Research Gate link: > https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Simpson3 > YouTube Channel > https://www.youtube.com/user/jjs0sbw > Web Site: > https://systemsconcept.org/ > > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > -- Joe Simpson “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” George Bernard Shaw Git Hub link: https://github.com/jjs0sbw Research Gate link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Simpson3 YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/jjs0sbw Web Site: https://systemsconcept.org/
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
