Patrick, List,
Patrick wrote the 28 June:
"I like to start out from Peirce's definition of the real as "that object
for which truth stands""
I could not find this definition in the CP... could you tell from where you
got it?
I found this one, closely related:
CP 1.339 [...] Finally, the interpretant is nothing but another
representation to which the torch of truth is handed along; and as
representation, it has its interpretant again. Lo, another infinite series.
(I imagine that "Lo" is "So")
Thanks
Claudio
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
