>Max, the tone of your note is overly contentious. Try not to call somebody >uninformed even if you think your information is better than that of the other >person. Misinformed is probably worse. I would rather be called "misinformed" than "uninformed"--"misinformed" at least implies that I have tried to figure out what is going on but have been talking to the wrong people, while "uninformed" implies that I have made no attempt to learn anything but think I have something worth saying anyway. Brad DeLong
- Re: More "Middle Class" nonsense, was Re: egres... Jim Devine
- Re: More "Middle Class" nonsense,was Re: egres... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: More "Middle Class" nonsense,was Re: e... Joel Blau
- RE: Regressivity of FICA and EITC phaseout (Re: Richard R... Nathan Newman
- RE: RE: Regressivity of FICA and EITC phaseout (Re: Richa... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Richard Rorty and social security Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Richard Rorty and social security Max Sawicky
- RE: Richard Rorty and social security Max Sawicky
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: RE: Richard Rorty and social security Michael Perelman
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Brad De Long
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Joel Blau
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Joel Blau
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Doug Henwood
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: US politics Jim Devine
- Re: Re: US politics Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: US politics michael
- Re: Re: Re: US politics Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: US politics Doug Henwood