Louis: But it is not anti-entitlement rhetoric. It is rhetoric against a particular threshold for mandating taxes against the more affluent elderly, which, as Max said, in the context of a screed against growing income inequality, is an entirely different matter. To pursue the logic of your position, one would have to say that someone could receive an unlimited amount of income without any taxes on social security. Social security or no social security, no taxes on the wealthy does not sound like a militant socialist politics. Joel Blau "It is not sufficient to oppose the legislation using the worst kind of anti-entitlement rhetoric that he employs."
- RE: Regressivity of FICA and EITC phaseout (Re: Richard R... Nathan Newman
- RE: RE: Regressivity of FICA and EITC phaseout (Re: Richa... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Richard Rorty and social security Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Richard Rorty and social security Max Sawicky
- RE: Richard Rorty and social security Max Sawicky
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: RE: Richard Rorty and social security Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: Richard Rorty and social security Brad De Long
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Joel Blau
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Joel Blau
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Doug Henwood
- Richard Rorty and social security Louis Proyect
- Re: US politics Jim Devine
- Re: Re: US politics Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: US politics michael
- Re: Re: Re: US politics Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: US politics Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: US politics Joel Blau
- Re: Re: Re: US politics David Dorkin
- Re: Richard Rorty and social security Ken Hanly