On Fri, 12 May 2000, Lisa & Ian Murray wrote: > Lets see, US firms make the stuff in China then send it back duty free to > sell to US consumers [or anywhere else]; just what does trade deficit mean > in this circumstance? My guess is zilch. Well, it does mean something in the comparative sense that Japan and the EU run big trade surpluses in their good sectors vis-a-vis the US, and they're just as globalized as we are. This suggests, in turn, that the mighty US economy is far less mighty than Wall Street would like us to believe, that deep structural problems are being papered over by a financial bubble. Usually, peripheries run huge deficits with metropoles, not the other way around. -- Dennis
- RE: Re: RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI i... Max B. Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.... Martin Hart-Landsberg
- RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in C... Nathan Newman
- Re: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. ... Martin Hart-Landsberg
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: EPI Pa... Patrick Bond
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: EPI Pa... Max B. Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE... Martin Hart-Landsberg
- No Nafta for Africa Louis Proyect
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE... Max Sawicky
- RE: RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Dennis R Redmond
- RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Charles Brown
- RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: Re: RE: RE: EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Charles Brown
- EPI Paper on U.S. FDI in China Charles Brown