Tom Walker wrote: >I will say, however, that pooh-poohing the apocalypse can be as much of a >pose as apocalypticism itself. It might even be interesting to ask whether >apocalyptic pooh-poohing isn't itself just a variation on the theme of >apocalypse. In other words, Sawicky's rhetorical labelling of Chossudovsky's >tract as "apocalyptic" was itself an apocalyptic gesture. Are you waxing deconstructive here, Tom? Being anti-apocalyptic requies an (unacknowledge) dependency on the notion of apocalypse? If so, what is the unnarativizable other? Speaking of which, has anyone ever deconstructed the productive/unproductive labor binary? Doug
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II valis
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Doug Henwood
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Tom Walker
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Colin Danby
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Tom Walker
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Doug Henwood
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Doug Henwood
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II maxsaw
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Ellen Dannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Global Financial Crisis II PHILLPS
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II maxsaw
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Tom Walker
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Tom Walker
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Rosenberg, Bill
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Patrick Bond
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Doug Henwood
- Re: Global Financial Crisis II Louis Proyect