Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1

[JKSCHW]

In a message dated 00-06-03 21:11:11 EDT, you write:

<< The main point is that it wasn't an $85 per month furnished room.
 
 >be bought. If he stayed silent on no-fault, it was not because he was
 bribed, 
 >but because there are serious consumerist arguments against it. There are, 
 
 The problem with Naderism is that we have to accept the honest motives of
 the leader pretty much as a given. It is in the nature of nonprofits,
 especially inside-the-beltway types like Public Citizen, to make decisions
 ON BEHALF of the public. It is inherently undemocratic. >>

These are fair criticisms. They are of a different order and kind than 
corruption, which is what Ralph's former friend charges him with. --jks