[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The comments about Jefferson and the Constitution are almost too silly to >discuss. J was no great fan of the C, which he did not sign precisely because >of its comparative conservatism, And as for the anti-majoritarainsim od the >C, and especially the Bill of Rights, is that such a bad thing? Some people >might think that it is the anti-majoritarianism of the C that is precisely >its glory, in providing discrete and insular minorities a defense against >majoritarianian oppression. --jks Oh yes, the propertied minority needs vigorous protection against the masses. Just ask Madison, Federalist #10. Doug
- Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Louis Proyect
- Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 WSheasby
- Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Michael Hoover
- Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Nader campaign, part 1 Doug Henwood