I have criticized others for personalizing their attacks on Brad. I have not had
the time to read all of the posts today regarding the IMF. I did glance at Jim's
note. While it was harsh, him did make a point about the the way Brad debates.
Brad tends to frame the debate the way he wants, which is his prerogative, but
then he demands that others respond within the framework.
The best way to avoid flame wars is to present your evidence without personally
challenging individuals. You may respond to a point that they make and explain
your position, but try to keep the personality out of the discussion.
Also Brad tends to him right as if he were a schoolmarm correcting wayward
children.
Brad DeLong wrote:
> >I object strongly, however, to repeated smart-ass intrusions by an allegedly
> >"brilliant" economist who deigns to spend time with the progressively
> >inclined...
> >
> >Michael K.
>
> As I said, if you had arguments to make, you would make them. You
> clearly don't. So why don't you be quiet until you do?
>
> Brad DeLong
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901
