Jim Devine wrote: >BTW, what does the petrogeological profession as a whole think of >Hubbert? what is the professional consensus on his methods and >conclusions? why should we believe him rather than others? or is he >"reputable" the way Milton Friedman is? When Mark started going on about the disappearance of oil a few years ago, I called around to a bunch of industry savants, and had several on the radio. Mark's opnion is definitely a minority one - which doesn't make it wrong, of course. But he doesn't often acknowledge this. A guy from the Petroleum Finance Corp. agreed with me when I suggested the real danger was that we'd choke ourselves if we burned all the oil we have, rather than it running out disastrously soon. Doug
- Re: RE: Re: Current implications for South Africa Doug Henwood
- Re: Current implications for South Africa Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Current implications for South Africa Patrick Bond
- Re: Current implications for South Africa Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Current implications for South Africa Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: Re: Current implications for South Afri... Mark Jones
- capitalism's expansion vs. limits Jim Devine
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limits Michael Perelman
- RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limits Mark Jones
- Re: RE: capitalism's expansion vs. limit... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's expans... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism's ex... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism'... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalism'... Jim Devine
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limits Patrick Bond
- Re: Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limit... Jim Devine
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. limi... Chris Burford
- Re: Re: capitalism's expansion ... Jim Devine
- Re: capitalism's expansion vs. ... Chris Burford
- Re: Re: capitalism's expansion ... Rob Schaap
- Patrick Bond on Rwanda & the Congo Michael Pollak