. . . The effects of any form of undisguised wall-to-wall US protectionism on world trade today would be presumably, completely catastrophic, the debacle even worse than 1929-31. Is the Godley view that this debacle is inevitable anyway, so it's a case of sauve qui peut? Mark Jones I presume a plausible U.S. "protectionism" would not be an all-or-nothing thing, but a modulated policy negotiated in some kind of concert with other countries (naturally with a U.S. edge in bargaining power). Whether/how it would work I have no idea. mbs
- RE: Re: RE: wynne godley Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: wynne godley Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: wynne godley Christian Gregory
- Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Jim Devine
- wynne godley Keaney Michael
- wynne godley Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Jim Devine
- protectionism Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: wynne godley Rakesh Narpat Bhandari
- RE: wynne godley Tom Walker
- wynne godley Charles Brown
- RE: wynne godley Max Sawicky
- Re: wynne godley Jim Devine
- Re: wynne godley Michael Pugliese
- wynne godley Charles Brown
- Re: wynne godley Jim Devine