On 2002/03/28 11:55 PM, "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> the state
> by Carrol Cox
> 27 March 2002 23:02 UTC  < < <
> 
> 
> 
> This would fit in with Wood's argument (in _Democracy against
> Capitalism_) that capitalism artificially divided the political into the
> two separate realms of "the political" and "the economy." If one takes
> "politics" to be concerned with the allocation of human activity, then
> "economics" is the guise that this political activity takes on under
> capitalism. And in the latest stages of capitalism the line has become
> thinner and thinner.
> 
> Carrol
> 
> ^^^^^^^^
> 
> CB: Economics is politics , and politics is concentrated economics.
> 
Comrade Carrol

 If economnic is politics, for example, buyer of commodity and seller
exchage commodity politically. Principle of politics is human's will.
But in this situation, commodity exchange  is not deternmined by political
will of both.As Marx said, juditical(i.e.political) relation is but the
reflux of the real economic relation.
Below is from Capital
"In order that these objects may enter into relation with each other as
commodities, their guardians must place themselves in relation to one
another, as persons whose will resides in those object, and must behave in
such a way that each does not appropriate the commodity of the other, and
part with his own, except by means of an act done by mutual consent. They
must therefore, mutually recognise in each other the rights of private
proprietors. This juridical relation, which thus expresses itself in a
contract, whether such contract be part of a developed legal system or not,
is a relation between two wills, and is but the reflex of the real economic
relation between the two. It is this economic relation that determines the
subject-matter comprised in each such juridical act. [2]

The persons exist for one another merely as representatives of, and,
therefore. as owners of, commodities. In the course of our investigation we
shall find, in general, that the characters who appear on the economic stage
are but the personifications of the economic relations that exist between
them. "
 
> Marx begins with criticism of religion,(The German Ideology) then criticism of
state(Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right,,) and finally criticism of
civil society.
So,later marx's work include criticism of state, which is defined that"The
specific economic form, in which unpaid surplus-labour is pumped out of
direct producers, determines the relationship of rulers and ruled, as it
grows directly out of production itself and, in turn, reacts upon it as a
determining element. Upon this, however, is founded the entire formation of
the economic community which grows up out of the production relations
themselves, thereby simultaneously its specific political form. It is always
the direct relationship of the owners of the conditions of production to the
direct producers -- a relation always naturally corresponding to a definite
stage in the development of the methods of labour and thereby its social
productivity -- which reveals the innermost secret, the hidden basis of the
entire social structure and with it the political form of the relation of
sovereignty and dependence, in short, the corresponding specific form of the
state. This does not prevent the same economic basis ""However, it is
evident that tradition must play a dominant role in the primitive and
undeveloped circumstances on which these social production relations and the
corresponding mode of production are based. It is furthermore clear that
here as always it is in the interest of the ruling section of society to
sanction the existing order as law and to legally establish its limits given
through usage and tradition. Apart from all else, this, by the way, comes
about of itself as soon as the constant reproduction of the basis of the
existing order and its fundamental relations assumes a regulated and orderly
form in the course of time. And such regulation and order are themselves
indispensable elements of any mode of production, if it is to assume social
stability and independence from mere chance and arbitrariness. These are
precisely the form of its social stability and therefore its relative
freedom from mere arbitrariness and mere chance. Under backward conditions
of the production process as well as the corresponding social relations, it
achieves this form by mere repetition of their very reproduction. If this
has continued on for some time, it entrenches itself as custom and tradition
and is finally sanctioned as an explicit law."
So Marx seeks rather integration of the economical and political than
traditional marxist considers the two as separaeted domain.
MIYACHI TATSUO
Psychiatric Department
Komaki municipal hosipital
1-20.JOHBUHSHI
KOMAKI CITY
AICHI PREF.
486-0044
TEL:0568-76-4131
FAX 0568-76-4145
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 

Reply via email to