Anders wrote (in reply to many thoughts): >Maybe I'm not reading carefully enough, but did you answered >Doug's question about what your alternative would be? You say >what you would not advise them to do, but that's really not an >answer. I'm sure they could come up all by themselves lots >of reasons why what their approach has serious problems, but >if you can't tell them what they might do instead, they aren't >any better off.
"Better off" is at the heart of it. While one can claim pedigree by citing "Marxist reason for not offering alternative"... if there is no alternative, there is no hope for improvement. Aldo M. touched upon this early in my involvement in this list. It remains true. What is the replacement? Ken.
