-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Moin,
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 09:10, Adam Kennedy wrote: > Andy Lester wrote: > > Why are we worrying about these automated kwalitee tests? What will > > happen once we find that DBIx::Wango has only passed 7 of these 23 > > items on the checklist? > > I thought the same thing, until kwalitee turned competative. Now we > have a situation in which a large number of authors have altered their > behaviour to match the scoring mechanism. > > So once you find out DBIx::Wango only passed 7 out of 23, it will go > into the author's average, and if he ever looks presumably the > competative spirit will kick in and he's fix some of the "problems" I thought that was the whole point behind this. And I look forward to learn about problems I didn't even know existed before. Of course, it is up to me (Joe Author) to weed out virtual from real problems. (Given the low test-coverage most modules have, I'd say most people will ignore CPANTS, too). It is a tool, you are free to not use it. :) best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Tue Sep 6 18:03:22 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "I am soo clumsy today." *crash* -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQx3BCHcLPEOTuEwVAQHrwAf/TPMXDtH6/p/rq6GwQEqzqePvN/MHbnB6 qaODl09NOHPVXQv74jZWUF4L9/2Dq5/RPYEUiZVbqaIQZEpQ9ChTY2ZeYLXhC5ON v1/hBwuS/tVmlI1JtMiGuNfrk5WAPmEkLeiPM7oB09EvReKQ9WAwyFnncgD4ap+r cwTkR6pld7wKje4nm6uIwuxu84XBlGtz4MlzOnyxea7zYq4TZq4wRltCqxarvVIZ gWdMDmABt0RWfbR8nTEB3NP5+i4Cyt9BRwMWx5eQwcCzYnz0GI6jHNMPqXsluYG6 B1h+24IoEoJiY0NcKAwFAXeCdOLy2+Cz0B20qk48PSFXbuB3AauTxA== =SmzH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
