On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:00 +0200, David Landgren wrote: > As I was downloading the newest version of Devel::Cover this morning, I > pondered on the concept of 1 Kwalitee point for coverage >= 80%, and > another for 100%, and how absolutely impossible it would be to set out > to establish these points for all the modules on CPAN. But it would be Good.
80% is probably fine, but I see 100% test coverage as indicating that the module is either simple enough not to trip bugs or really difficult problems in Devel::Cover or that the author has mangled the code sufficiently to get 100% coverage. The former might be a sign of kwalitee, but the latter really just isn't. -- c
