On 11/4/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say just check that META.yml conforms to whatever version of the spec it says it conforms to. If it doesn't have a version, assume 1.0.
I have to second this. There really shouldn't be separate "conforms to 1.0" and "conforms to 1.2" metrics and so on. What happens as the spec evolves? Unless the spec is broken, encouraging specific "latest spec compliant" is just churn and Kwalitee breaks if there's ever a change that isn't backwards compatible. The test should be whether the META.yml is "well-formed" -- meaning that it's valid according to the spec that it declares (or 1.0 otherwise). As a side note, it looks like Ken just released the blead spec as 1.3 and updated the "current" hyperlink to point to the new spec. I don't know if any of the release tools output 1.3 yet, but at least the spec is "official" now. So, if you want a "bonus point" META.yml spec metric, that should really be "conforms to current META.yml spec" Regards, David David
