Hi! On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:58:11AM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> But yeah, other than that, I agree, the metric should check that > META.yml conforms to the spec it says it conforms to, and that > a metric that checks for conformance to the latest version should > be a bonus, if it exists at all. I renamed the metrics to metayml_conforms_spec_1_0 (which is (AFAIK) the first well-defined version, even if some of the fields might only be upgraded to 'required' later. And to metayml_conforms_spec_current, which will always point to whatever http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-current.html says. And it's an optional metric (like has_example and is_prereq) -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}