On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 03:03:51PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 19 November 2007 14:30:51 Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > > I think the real solution, though, is to agree that the perl interpreter > > without all of the core modules installed isn't Perl. (I'm not a big > > fan of core modules, but the concept is especially worthless if you > > can't depend on their existence.)
To your own modules? If so, why on earth is anyone upset about this? > Any chance you could convince a few thousand ISPs of that? I'm game. And this is why. Nicholas Clark
