* On Sun, Jun 29 2008, chromatic wrote: > However, does making CPAN a better place require publishing a Hall of Shame > on > perl.org? > > http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame
Good point. The same could be said for CPAN Ratings also. Why should my module have 1 star next to it because any goof with a web browser can write a review? Why is the opinion of someone with no ties to the community considered relevant enough to show in the search.cpan search results? (The same goes for positive ratings. I've seen a lot of high ratings of modules that are rated highly for no good reason, or rated that way by its own author.) I personally don't care and generally ignore the ratings, but it's the same thing as Kwalitee, except not even objective. Regards, Jonathan Rockway -- print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"
