# from Andy Lester # on Thursday 22 January 2009 11:31: >> I personally use no_plan only because I can't be bothered to >> manually count things and don't want to assume that the number of >> tests run on *my* computer is somehow a universal constant. > >I'm glad you find no_plan useful. Many others do as well.
Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan' to be useful in their current state. --Eric -- If the collapse of the Berlin Wall had taught us anything, it was that socialism alone was not a sustainable economic model. --Robert Young --------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com ---------------------------------------------------