On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 12:31:12AM +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > I'd suggested another name, but since Unicode::Normalize has already > been taken I can only think of > > Unicode::UTR15 # not appropriate, since it doesn't cover KD and KC > Unicode::FormC # not appropriate, since it covers NFKD > Unicode::FormCD # ugly Or I could just deprecate it in favour of Unicode::Normalize. Less work for me! :) -- No proper program contains an indication which as an operator-applied occurrence identifies an operator-defining occurrence which as an indication- applied occurrence identifies an indication-defining occurrence different from the one identified by the given indication as an indication-applied occurrence. - Algol 68 Report
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UCA Alan Bellingham
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort... Simon Cozens
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... Martin Duerst
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... Martin_Hosken
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort... Martin Duerst
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... SADAHIRO Tomoyuki
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... Simon Cozens
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort::UC... Martin Duerst
- Re: please test Text::Unicode::Normalize + Sort... Jarkko Hietaniemi