On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:47:36PM +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
> At 19:39 01/08/16 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:57:31AM +0900, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki wrote:
> > > Considering the particularity of Hangul Syllables,
> > > would it be better to gather those functions into one module?
> >
> >I think so, yes; if I was dealing with Hangul data, I don't think
> >I'd be surprised to have to download a CPAN module to get the naming
> >algorithms and so on.
>
> But you may be surprised that you need it just to do normalization,
> I guess. Maybe one solution is to separate (de)composition and
Nope. Parts of it are useful elsewhere, such as the new Unicode::UCD
module (IIUC).
> naming algorithms for Hangul into two separate modules. But I
> guess I would prefer to have (de)composition in the normalization
> module; it's just two rather simple functions. The functions are
> actually so simple that it would not really hurt if there were
> copies in both the lingua...hangul module (for hangul linguistic
> processing) and the normalization module (for general normalization).
For now, I'm putting it in as a one single module.
> Regards, Martin.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
