On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:35:08AM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >I'd suggested another name, but since Unicode::Normalize has already
> been taken I can only think of
>
> I can't remember if I am still owner of this namespace. If so, then I am
> happy to give it up in favour of a core normalization module, agreed on by
> this list. (I.e. I am losing track of which modules are out there and which
> are heading towards the core for 5.8)
>
> Martin Hosken
>
> PS. One little awkwardness with UTR15 is that the specification (D2) of
> composition (C or KC) is that you:
> 1. Decompose against the current Unicode database
> 2. Compose against the Unicode database v3.0.0
> Notice that you don't compose against the current Unicode database.
>
> PS2. Any chance that the Text::Unicode::Normalize module (if it is going
As Unicode::Normalize, yes, very probably.
> into the core) can have its dependency onLingua::KO::Hangul::Util removed?
The core can always assimilate Lingua::KO::Hangul, too...
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
