Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Okay, I am convinced that we should stick with the original, long, >user-friendly names but how about ucm-transitions?
..ucm's are (significantly?) larger than .enc - particularly is you keep the per-character comments > As of Encode-0.98, there are so many duped tables under Encode/ and I >want to tidy it up if possible. Well, for this I will wait what >Sadahiro-san has to say.... Once Encode::Tcl has taken its .enc files off to a separate existance then the duplicates can go. > At leas euc-jp must be in *.ucm because it contains triple-bytes (JIS >X 0212), which Encode::Tcl used to handle via Encode::Tcl::Extended but >now ::Extended is gone.... > >Dan the Encode Maintainer -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
