Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, possibly $#.

[Buddha Buck]

At 11:21 PM 8/18/00 +0300, Ariel Scolnicov wrote:

>Actually, this suggests that C<values @array> should return
>C<(@array)> (a copy of the values), and C<keys @array> the list
>C<(0..$#array)>.  But those aren't very useful.

I dunno...

my @a :sparse;
@a[1,5] = (1,1);
@k = keys @a;
print "@k";    # prints "1,2,3,4,5" or "1,5"?


>[...]
>
>--
>Ariel Scolnicov        |"GCAAGAATTGAACTGTAG"            | 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Compugen Ltd.          |Tel: +972-2-6795059 (Jerusalem) \ We recycle all 
>our Hz
>72 Pinhas Rosen St.    |Tel: +972-3-7658514 (Main 
>office)`---------------------
>Tel-Aviv 69512, ISRAEL |Fax: 
>+972-3-7658555    http://3w.compugen.co.il/~ariels