> > rather use a transpose() function for this that can transpose across a
given
> > axis.
>
> You'll be RFC'ing that, I suppose? ;-) (But seriously, it sounds like a
> good idea)
>
Yes, I will.
> > I don't think we need to define the ability to work on multiple lists as
> > special behaviour. Perl knows how to flatten lists, so any syntax we
define
> > will allow multiple lists simply by letting Perl join and flatten them.
>
> Right, unless you make the list the first argument, like NumPy:
>
> @b = rehape @a, [1,2];
>
> Then you're in trouble.
>
So we shouldn't make the list the first argument...
> > Finally, I think the dimensions specified by reshape() should be the
maximum
> > index of the axis, not the number of elements, since this way it matches
the
> > :bounds semantics. In this case, the wildcard would clearly need to -1.
>
> This sounds reasonable, but maybe just clarify this a little? Feel free
> to send me volumes of examples offline if need be.
>
RFC 203 defines a :bounds attribute that defines the maximum index of each
dimension of an array. RFC 206 provides the syntax @#array which returns
these maximum indexes. For consistancy, the arguments to reshape() should be
the maximum index of each dimension. A maximum index of '0' would mean that
that dimension is 1 element wide. Therefore '0' can not be special in
reshape(). Therefore we should use '-1'.
Let me know off-list if you'd like more clarification.
