Re: Continued RFC process

[Daniel Chetlin]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 08:23:07PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Having had cause to root around in the archives of perl6 and perl5 lists,
> can I suggest that we use the system that perl5-porters is archived on in
> preference to the system that the perl6 lists use (MHonArc, apparently).
> Personally I found the threaded summaries and search facility on the perl5
> archive much more effective. What do other people think?

Er, compared to what the perl6 lists are doing right now anything is
preferable. But xray _sucks_! Given the choice between searching xray
and chewing tinfoil, I might choose the tinfoil.

I don't know if it's the failings of MHonArc, or that xray is running an
old copy, or what ... but let's not standardize on xray. Please.

-dlc