At 07:09 PM 10/10/00 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Dan Sugalski writes:
> > "General consensus" is best, but that can't be guaranteed. "Consensus of
> > the ruling council" is more attainable, but there's that whole "ruling
> > council" thing to contend with. "What Larry says" is best, but what
> happens
> > if he doesn't, or gets hit by a bus at some point?
>
>In terms of ongoing maintenance, I'd say that the teams will act as
>the Ruling Council. When teams get pissed off with the release
>manager, then the leader will have to go. When members of a team
>can't work together, then the release manager works with them to
>figure out where the problem is and fix it. This might be everything
>from "play nice" to hiring a hitman :-)
Works. We still have those Quantum Ninja that we're holding in reserve for
Damian... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
