Steve Fink wrote: > and I get the same numbers for -O (I used -O3) but different numbers > without optimization. Maybe we should assume optimization? The difference was probably -fomit-frame-pointer that I used in both the -g and -O cases. Some of my code was fragile to optimization so I wanted to make sure that it didn't depend on the frame pointer for local variables. - Ken
- virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Simon Cozens
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation opti... Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementa... Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implem... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implem... John Porter
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi