Some sort of SGI megaserver, dunno MHz, but load is high (more than five times the number of CPUs...), so the following numbers are a tad slow, but I guess relatively right: -O3 none switch 7.02 7.70 orig 16.59 15.92 naive 18.96 18.96 hybrid 17.54 16.38 linear 17.54 16.37 predictable 21.89 20.53 And to continue on the nitpicking theme :-) one warning more: cc-1174 cc: WARNING File = vm.c, Line = 209 The variable "ops" was declared but never referenced. static void *ops[] = { op_stop, op_push, op_add, op_print }; ^ -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Simon Cozens
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation opti... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation... Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementa... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementa... John Porter
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi