Some sort of SGI megaserver, dunno MHz, but load is high (more than
five times the number of CPUs...), so the following numbers are a tad slow,
but I guess relatively right:
-O3 none
switch 7.02 7.70
orig 16.59 15.92
naive 18.96 18.96
hybrid 17.54 16.38
linear 17.54 16.37
predictable 21.89 20.53
And to continue on the nitpicking theme :-) one warning more:
cc-1174 cc: WARNING File = vm.c, Line = 209
The variable "ops" was declared but never referenced.
static void *ops[] = { op_stop, op_push, op_add, op_print };
^
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Simon Cozens
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation opti... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation... Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementa... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementa... John Porter
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Ken Fox
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Steve Fink
- Re: virtual machine implementation options Jarkko Hietaniemi
