Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm beginning to loathe software licenses in a *big* way, and I'm a half > step away from saying to hell with it all and going fully public domain. > (Or at least pushing for it, as I don't control perl's licensing terms) Public domain has it's own troubles too. To be safe in doing a public domain license, we'll need to get copyright disclaimers from everyone who contributes code (and possibly their employers). Otherwise, someone could come along later and legally claim copyright on some part. > Liceses. Bletch. Don't blame the licenses, blame the copyright law that makes them an unfortunate necessity in many cases. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Tim Jenness
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations David Grove
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- public domain? (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- licensing issues (was Re: standard representations) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski