At 15:32 -0500 2001.01.05, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>Honestly, the license we choose will only restrict those people who will
>respect it, either for moral or legal reasons. That's one reason to choose
>a license that places the fewest restrictions on those people, and the GPL
>is not that license.
True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl,
which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well.
But yes, I see no way to put perl solely under the GPL. That's just about
the worst thing we could do, aside from making perl non-"free."
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
