[Snipped perl-internals, this is off topic there]
Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think that Bradley is suggesting that Perl would "go more GPL",
> because that would be indefensibly insane.
That is correct. Someone else did propose that, and it forked a tangent
about defensibility of licenses.
> Bradley is proposing that Perl should continue to be licensed under the
> GPL *and* a free license, such as the Artistic License, but he's saying
> that the AL needs a lot more tightening up so that it is legally
> enforcable. I think this makes a lot of sense.
Yes. I wrote an RFC about this, which you should be able to find in the RFC
archives. I don't have the number handy, but it is in the two-hundreds,
IIRC.
--
Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
PGP signature
