On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:27:21PM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Could you explain why do you think going more GPL would be a good thing > for Perl? I do not think that Bradley is suggesting that Perl would "go more GPL", because that would be indefensibly insane. Bradley is proposing that Perl should continue to be licensed under the GPL *and* a free license, such as the Artistic License, but he's saying that the AL needs a lot more tightening up so that it is legally enforcable. I think this makes a lot of sense. -- Reporter (to Mahatma Gandhi): Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western Civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues Dan Sugalski
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Andy Dougherty
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: licensing issues John van V
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Re: licensing issues John van V