Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

[abigail]

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:45:16AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> 
> I don't think anyone is suggesting that we make changes just
> because we can.  OBVIOUSLY we would only implement changes
> that add something desirable.  And the weight of known
> desirables is large, or we wouldn't be making perl6.


How does removing time() add something desirable?


Abigail