At 11:11 PM 5/10/01 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:41:09PM -0400, David Grove wrote: > > > Anywhere else? :) > > FreeBSD comes to mind, among others. > >Hm. You initially restricted your survey to commercial vendors, but now >you are moving the goalposts. > > > Can we get back to the subject now? > >Certainly. The subject was whether or not Perl 5.6.x has been taken >up by the industry. Sigh. Do I dare wade back in? But the voices in my head won't stop :-) With respect - and I do mean that - the subject as I started it was, Is "Perl 6" the most appropriate title for what we discuss here and what brave people like yourself will be implementing? If it's at all possible to discuss that without devolving into tangential political debates, I'd like to do so. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com
- Re: Perl, the new generation Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- RE: Perl, the new generation Sam Tregar
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Graham Barr
- Re: Perl, the new generation John Porter
- Re: Perl, the new generation Bart Lateur
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski