On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:41:09PM -0400, David Grove wrote: > > Anywhere else? :) > FreeBSD comes to mind, among others. Hm. You initially restricted your survey to commercial vendors, but now you are moving the goalposts. > Can we get back to the subject now? Certainly. The subject was whether or not Perl 5.6.x has been taken up by the industry. I think we've proved that it has. Can we go back - uh, forward - to Perl 6 now? -- "I think i'll take my girlfriend to vegas for a win'98 burn/upgrade...." -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- RE: Perl, the new generation Sam Tregar
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Graham Barr
- Re: Perl, the new generation John Porter
- Re: Perl, the new generation Bart Lateur