Dan Sugalski wrote: > Basically my preference, if we're going with a per-object .ISA with no > class ISA fallback, is for each object to be independent and not affect any > other object when its properties are messed with. Good; that's the norm in prototype-based OO, and I believe, in Frame systems as well. -- John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Michael G Schwern
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object David Whipp
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Bart Lateur
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark Koopman
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object (the ::: ... John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object (the ::: ... David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark J. Reed
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark J. Reed
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol