At 11:45 AM 6/27/2001 -0700, Mark Koopman wrote: >>* Objects are bigger since they all need an .ISA property, if we toss the >>per-class @ISA > > >with an accessible .ISA property, are previous instaniated objects >'brought-up-to-speed' with this new behaviour or not? Depends on what you mean by that. Since I have no clue, I couldn't say. :) If you mean would updating one object's .ISA property update them all, I'd rather we not do that. If you mean do we update all the object's .ISA properties when we change the class' default ISA, I'd rather not do that if we're instantiating ISA on a per-object basis. Basically my preference, if we're going with a per-object .ISA with no class ISA fallback, is for each object to be independent and not affect any other object when its properties are messed with. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Trond Michelsen
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Michael G Schwern
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Damian Conway
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object David Whipp
- RE: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Bart Lateur
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark Koopman
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object (the ::: ... David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark J. Reed
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object David L. Nicol
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Mark J. Reed
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object Dan Sugalski
- Re: Multiple classifications of an object John Porter