On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:32:32PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Right, but FORTH's not an interpreted language, generally speaking.
No, but PostScript is. :-) (...as if that wasn't completely obvious...) Z.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:32:32PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Right, but FORTH's not an interpreted language, generally speaking.
No, but PostScript is. :-) (...as if that wasn't completely obvious...) Z.