At 12:36 PM 12/5/2001 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: >On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > The Zork interpreter might be stack based, thinking about it, but it was > > hardly geared for speed, so I don't know that it'd count if it was. > >FWIW, there are many MUDs and MUCKs out there (multiplayer text-based >role-playing gmaes for those not in the know) that use a variation on >FORTH as their programming language, which is purely stack-based IIRC.
Right, but FORTH's not an interpreted language, generally speaking. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk