On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 15:12, Piers Cawley wrote: > "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:56:11PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> >> > $_[_][EMAIL PROTECTED] _=_0_-_ > > $_.[_()] _ @_._() _= _0_() - _() [...] > > This is where my interpretation fails because the result of step 5 > > is not an lvalue. > > How do you know that? '_' could be a method on its LHS that returns > and object that responds to _=. But generally, I think it's weird. Yes, I was thinking that there would be lvalue-methods or operator overloading of some sort in the _= Oh the joy of subtle code features, eh?
