On Wed 04 Sep 2002 03:47, Richard Soderberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Markus Laire wrote: > > > > * the name "perl6-internals" is really too restrictive (but this point has > > > already been discussed last week). > > > Would it be possible to rename "perl6-internals" now to something > > better like "parrot-internals"? > > +1. > > > There probably are some big problems in renaming an active list, but > > this could give us more non-perl developers interested in parrot. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] was renamed at one point, due to conflict related to the > name. The old addresses for it still work, but it's renamed as far as the > outside world's concerned.
Most (90%) of the smoke report still flow in through [EMAIL PROTECTED] only very few use [EMAIL PROTECTED] /maybe/ I should change my sig :P -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0 & 633 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3, WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11. Smoking perl CORE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
