At 11:23 PM -0400 9/4/02, John Porter wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> John Porter wrote:
>> > Some folks seem to think that sufficient reason exists now.
>>
>> That's fine. You don't have to convince some folks. You have to convince me.
>
>Actually, uh, I was kinda hoping that some folks would convince you. :-)
I'm apparently reasonably difficult to convince. :)
>Anyway, whenever someone (and it seems like I'm the only one who does)
>tries to invoke the Perl Gods around here, you're always quick to brandish
>your +5 Mace of Iconoclasty.
Well, it's got a nice grip, and the balance is good. The larger ones
are overkill most of the time anyway.
>You're quick to assert that this ain't your
>father's Olds, but you're not quite ready to allow that it might not be
>an Olds at all.
IYHO, of course. Which turns out to be wrong here, but that's OK.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
