On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:53:02PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > Brent Dax had a nice suggestion for Perl 6 test organization. I like it > tremendously. > > I repost it here to solicit comments -- to make this work, I'll need to change
Did anyone comment on it? It seems a sane to me, and I certainly can't suggest a better way to do it. [I'll quote the rest of the message so that everyone can read it again if they want to] > the Perl 6 test harness to find all of the tests. I'll also need to create > several different subdirectories as appropriate. Rearranging things after the > fact is a bit of a chore with CVS (if you want to keep revision history), so I > welcome feedback. > > Brent's post follows. > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:01:44 +0000, Brent Dax wrote: > > > I don't see why we can't do this. > > > > t/ > > var/ > > scalar/ > > string/ > > to_bool.t > > from_bool.t > > ... > > regress.t > > num/ > > bool/ > > ref/ > > typed/ > > prop/ > > taint/ > > array/ > > normal/ > > sized/ > > typed/ > > hash/ > > normal/ > > restricted/ > > typed/ > > code/ > > normal/ > > proto/ > > vari/ > > curry/ > > anonymous/ > > placehold/ > > oper/ > > normal/ > > arithmetic.t > > string.t > > list.t > > logic.t > > junction.t > > misc.t > > vector/ > > arithmetic.t > > string.t > > list.t > > junction.t > > misc.t > > regex/ > > alone/ > > grammar/ > > TestGrm/ > > module/ > > TestMod/ > > meta.t > > export.t > > globals.t > > class/ > > TestCls/ > > ... > > > > -- c Nicholas Clark -- INTERCAL better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
