> Anyone but me feel the need for non-greedy slurpy arrays? similar to
> non-greedy RE matches?
> Then we could do:
>
> sub for ([EMAIL PROTECTED], &block) {...}
>
> Proposed behavior of *?@ : All Arguement to Parameter mapping left of it
> are processed Left to Right. Once seen, the mapping starts over right to
> left. Everything remaining is slurpable.With obvious restrictions on "no other slurpy/semi-slurpy arrays" in the param list, b/c that would make things go insane, IMHO. Although, I guess with typing, you could do splits on the typed params between, and assuming there was no ambiguity ... Ow, my head hurts now :o --attriel
