----- Original Message -----
From: "Leon Brocard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: subroutines and python status


> K Stol sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Actually, I named my little project "pirate" (s.
> > http://members.home.nl/joeijoei/parrot for this) already, but it's a bit
of
> > a dead end already (although I learnt much of it), so I don't mind.
>
> Quick, we need more parrot jokes...

:-)

>
> I don't like things becoming dead-ends. How much work do you think
> it'd be to extend it some more and update it to latest Lua?

Well, at some point while writing the code generator, I had 2 problems.

1: I needed some Parrot features that weren't working yet, like events (I
need an op to post events or something)
so some essential features of the language couldn't be implemented.
2: I misdesigned the code generator; that is, at the point where I couldn't
start over, it was too late, the code generator was too big already (it was
unmaintainable). But because I had a time schedule, I kept it this way (the
product itself wasn't the most important thing, I was writing an
undergraduate report for the last semester of my education (for the record:
the project served me well, I finished this education))

> Would it
> be worth checking this into parrot CVS?
>
Only if the thing would be working, otherwise it would only be a source of
confusion and frustration.
Now I'm just thinking very hard to decide if I've got enough spare time to
rewrite the code generator....

Klaas-Jan


Reply via email to