Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>4) list.c > If you want to hack in on this, go ahead, though it looks like > something that we'll ultimately need--its the guts of a sparse > mixed-type array, which is useful and we may well need at some point.
Actually that was the reason, I implemented it like that. But I'd like to have it a bit simplified, that is: - for small element counts use that simplified scheme - else use the current chunk based one with constant chunk size This could simplify the code by a fare amount. leo
