Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, lets do the classes as:
> *) Array - fixed-size, mixed-type array > *) vPArray - variable-sized PMC array > *) PArray - Fixed-size PMC array > *) vSArray - variable-sized string array > *) SArray - fixed-size string array Actually I forgot one: We already have IntList, which is INTVAL only and doesn't bounds checking - vIArray in that naming convention. BTW SArray nicely meats current main usage as @argv :) > And so on, for N and I arrays. I'm not particularly attached to the > names. Nor am I. But the scheme sounds reasonable. leo
